Brand owner: Hewlett-Packard Company
Head office: Palo Alto, CA, USA
Sector: Electronics
Categories : Computers, Notebooks
Free Tags: Laptop, desktop, PC, netbook, monitor, screen
| 1. Does the brand (company) clearly support global mandatory cuts of carbon emissions of at least 50% by 2050 or 30% by industrialized countries by 2020? |
 |
The HP (brand owner of Compaq) website states that it "supports the IPCC recommendation that global GHG emissions be reduced by well below half of the emission levels in 2000 by the middle of this century" (see HP's position). | Source |
| 2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual carbon footprint of its 'own operations' and of the supply / production chain? |
|
HP's carbon footprint was 1.865.200 in 2010 (see GHG emissions in own operations). | Source |
| 3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its ‘own operations’ carbon footprint by at least 20% within the next 5 years? |
|
HP's goal is reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from HP-owned and HP-leased facilities by 20% relative to 2005 levels by the end of 2013 on an absolute basis (click 'Goals Operations'). | Source |
| 4. Has the brand (company) already reduced or compensated its 'own operations' carbon footprint by at least 10% in the last 5 years? |
|
The total GHG emission in 2008 was 2,165,500 tonnes. In 2010 the total GHG emission was 1,865,100 tonnes. This represents a reduction of 14%. | Source |
| 5. Do all new products of the brand meet the latest Energy Star requirements (where applicable)? |
 |
"HP is proud to offer our customers products with the Energy Star label." However, not all the products are qualified with the Energy Star requirements. Only 40% of the monitors are qualified. | Source |
| 1. Has the brand (company) eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? If not, does the brand give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
|
HP (brand owner of Compaq) has achieved 90% of its goal to phase out BFR and PVC in newly introduced personal computing products in 2011, subject to ready availability of technologically feasible alternatives for all components (Click Sustainable Design - Click Goals Materials). | Source |
| 2. Has the brand (company) already eliminated PVC and BFRs in all new products? |
|
HP still has PVC and BFRs in different applications (see remark previous question). | Source |
| 3. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates) in all of its new products? If not, does it give a timeline for achieving this by 2012? |
|
It seems that HP will only restrict (not ban) beryllium and antimony in 2012 (see timeline). Phthalates is not mentioned at all. | Source |
| 4. Has the brand (company) already eliminated at least 2 of the 3 groups of suspect chemicals (beryllium, antimony and phthalates)in all of its new products? |
|
HP still uses beryllium and antimony (see previous remark). | Source |
| 5. Does the brand (company) support the principle of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR), meaning that brands are responsibility for the entire lifecycle of their own products, including take back and recycling? |
|
HP has signed the Individual producer responsibility (IPR) statement and supports IPR explicitly. | Source |
| 6. Does the brand (company) provide free and easy take back and recycling services for its discarded products in many of the countries where its products are sold? |
 |
HP offers this service in approximately 40 to 50 countries but does not state which countries these are and how effective they are. | Source |
| 7. Does the brand (company) source at least 5% of its plastics from recycled plastic streams and does it give a clear timeline to increase this percentage to at least 25% by 2025? |
|
Some numbers are given, but they do not cover all products and no percentage is presented. "HP is the only company that recycles old cartridge plastic to make new Original HP inkjet print cartridges." | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a policy that excludes smelters of conflict minerals by only sourcing minerals from conflict free areas or by only sourcing minerals from conflict areas when human rights are respected and where contributing to conflict is avoided? |
|
HP's Supply Chain Social and Environmental Responsibility Policy states that it excludes smelters of conflict materials. | Source |
| 2. Does the brand (company) have a Code of Conduct (CoC) for both its own factories and those of its suppliers, which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
|
In HP's Electronics Industry Code of Conduct (EICC), all standards are mentioned. | Source |
| 3. Does the brand’s (company’s) CoC include at least 3 of the following workers rights: 1. a formally registered employment relationship 2. a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. a sufficient living wage 4. form and join labor unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, to develop parallel means? |
|
1. Not mentioned; 2. No, the CoC states a maximum of 60 hours per week but does not specify how many are overtime; 3. No, wages must comply with applicable wage laws but does not mention a living wage; 4. Yes, this right is mentioned as well as a parallel means in situations where these rights are restricted under law. | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
|
HP publishes a list of suppliers that represents 95% of its production supplier spend. | Source |
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a multi stakeholder initiative (MSI), wherein independent NGO’s or labor unions are represented, that collectively aims to improve labor conditions and that carries out independent audits? Or does the brand (company) significantly purchase its supplies from factories certified by such MSI’s? |
|
HP is a member of EICC, but civil society organizations do not have a decisive voice in this initiative. | Source |
| 6. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
|
HP (brand owner of Compaq) publishes a detailed overview of audits realized (92 in 2010) (see link). | Source |
| 7. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
|
HP (brand owner of Compaq) provides clear data on the compliance level amongst the audited facilities, but does not report on either a compliance level or monitored level for its labor conditions policy. | Source |