Cheap Monday & sustainability
| 1. Is there a policy for the brand to minimize, reduce or compensate carbon emissions?? |
|
H & M Group, brand owner of Cheap Monday, attempts to reduce its carbon emissions by, among others, sourcing energy from renewable sources, increasing energy efficiency in stores, and has engaged supplier factories energy efficiency programmes (see link, pages 58 - 64). | Source |
| 2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual absolute carbon footprint of its 'own operations' (Scope 1 & 2) and has the brand already reduced or compensated 10% of these emissions in the last 5 years? |
|
H & M Group, brand owner of Cheap Monday, publishes its carbon footprint. However, the 2012 footprint of own operations (344,912 tons COeq) represents an increase of around 38% compared to 2009 (250,152 tons COeq) see link, page 60). | Source |
| 3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce the carbon footprint of its 'own operations' by at least 20% within the next 5 years? |
|
H & M Group, brand owner of Cheap Monday, has set the target to reduce carbon emissions of total operations by 2015. However, no concrete target values are reported (see link, pages 58 -60). | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) also have a policy to reduce/compensate carbon emissions generated from the product supply chain that is beyond own operations? |
|
Since 2010 H & M Group has started a supplier Energy Efficiency Programme. In 2012 154 factories engaged in this programme (see link, page 64). | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 5% of its volume? |
|
In 2012 H & M Group increased, as an example, its use of sustainable cotton up to 11.4%. At that organic cotton represents 7.8% of its entire cotton use (see link, page 19). However, H & M does not provide percentages of the total use of environmentally friendly materials related to all raw materials. | Source |
| 2. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 10% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 3. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 25% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 4. Is there a policy for the brand (company) to eliminate all hazardous chemicals from the whole lifecycle and all production procedures? |
|
H & M Group has implemented several policies related to wet processes, such as committing to Greenpeace to the Zero Discharge of Hazardous Chemicals and making sure that these restrictions are understood and applied in its supply chain (see link, pages 70 - 80). | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
|
H & M Group, the brand owner of Cheap Monday, is a member of the Fair Labor Organisation (FLA), but has its own Code of Conduct, in which all of these standards are mentioned. | Source |
| 2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary and paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? |
|
1. Yes, formally registered employment relationship; 2. Maximum working week of 48 hours, voluntary paid overtime of 12 hours maximum; 3. "Living wage" is not mentioned (see pages 3-4). However, in 2011 H&M Group joined the Fair Wage Network, which will independently assess wage structures of around 200 H & M factories (see link, page 39). | Source |
| 3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? |
|
Freedom of association is mentioned, but nothing found about situations in which this right is restricted by law (see page 3). | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
|
H & M Group has published a "Global SupplierList". This list covers around 95% of H & M Group´s supplier as at 01.02.2013. | Source |
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labor conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labor conditions? |
|
H & M Group is a member of the Fair Labour Association (FLA), Sustainable Apperal Coalition, the Better Cotton Initiative, and other local or regional sustainability initiatives (see page 14). | Source |
| 6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labor unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? |
|
FLA is acknowledged as a Multi-Stakeholder Initiative. | Source |
| 7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
|
H & M Group conducted 2,646 audits of active factories in 2012. The results are published (see link, pages 32-46). | Source |
| 8. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
|
In 2012 H & M Group conducted 2,646 audits which means that on average every factory was audited 1,2 times (see link, page 33). | Source |
| 9. Does the brand (company) have a clear and effective health and safety policy for the workers in the finishing process of jeans, at least covering the ban on sandblasting? |
|
Cheap Monday openly communicates in its Code of Conduct that sandblasting is not allowed. | Source |