Rank a Brand

How sustainable is Pants to Poverty ?

Pants to Poverty & sustainability


Tenants_pants-to-poverty-logo

14 out of 16

Sustainability summary

Brand owner: Pants to Poverty
Head office: London, UK
Sector: Lingerie & underwear
Categories : Male, Female
Free Tags: 

What's your sustainability news about Pants to Poverty?

Pants to Poverty sustainability score report

Last edited: 17 April 2013 by Mario
Last reviewed: 17 April 2013 by Mario

Questions about Climate Change/ Carbon Emissions

2 out of 4
1. Is there a policy for the brand to minimize, reduce or compensate carbon emissions? Pants to Poverty has taken several policy measures to reduce carbon emissions, such as working with a factory that is carbon neutral. Source
2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual absolute carbon footprint of its 'own operations' (Scope 1 & 2) and has the brand already reduced or compensated 10% of these emissions in the last 5 years? Pants to Poverty has not published the policy or carbon footprint for their own operations. Source
3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its absolute ‘own operations’ carbon emissions by at least 20% within the next 5 years? Not found on the website, although the company seems to strive for a 100% good policy on an environmental and social level. Source
4. Does the brand (company) also have a policy to reduce/compensate carbon emissions generated from the product supply chain that is beyond own operations (Scope 3)? Pants to Poverty works with a factory that is carbon neutral. Source

Questions about Environmental Policy

4 out of 4
1. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 5% of its volume? Pants to Poverty uses only organic, FLO-CERT cotton for its products. Source
2. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 10% of its volume? See remark for environmental policy question 1. Source
3. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 25% of its volume? See remark for environmental policy question 1. Source
4. Does the brand (company) have an environmental policy related to the ‘wet processes’ within the production cycle, like bleaching and dying of fabrics? Pants to Poverty reports that the factory where Pants to Poverty´s clothing is produced aims to reduce the water consumption per pair of pants from approximately 100 litres per kilogram of fabric to less than half a pint. This goal shall be achieved through the implemention of a new dying unit. Source

Questions about Labour Conditions/ Fair Trade

8 out of 8
1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? Pants to Poverty follows the FLO Code of processing of Fair Trade Cotton. For Code of processing of Fair Trade Cotton, see link for questions 2&3 below. In this CoC all these standards are mentioned. Source
2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary and paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? In FLO code for processing Fair Trade Cotton: 1. Yes, legally-binding employment relationships; 2. Yes, maximum workweek of 48 hours, overtime (max 12 hours) is voluntary; 3. Yes, Living wages are paid. Source
3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? In FLO code for processing Fair Trade Cotton: This right is mentioned, with reference to parallel means for the situation of law restrictions. Source
4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? Pants to Poverty is working with two suppliers: Chetna Organic (Collective of Fair Trade Farmers) and Armstrong (Factory). Source
5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labor conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labor conditions? All of Pants to Poverty's materials are FLO-CERT. FLO-CERT is acknowledged as a certification scheme that meets this criteria. Source
6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labor unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? FLO-CERT is acknowledged as a certification scheme that meets this criteria. Source
7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? Pants to Poverty purchases 100% of its supplies from a FLO-CERT producer. Source
8. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? All of Pants to Poverty's materials are FLO-CERT, thus 'monitored'. Source