Billabong & sustainability
| 1. Is there a policy for the brand to minimize, reduce or compensate carbon emissions? |
|
Billabong has an annual carbon inventory (see 'Carbon Footprint'). | Source |
| 2. Has the brand (company) disclosed the annual absolute carbon footprint of its 'own operations' (Scope 1 & 2) and has the brand already reduced or compensated 10% of these emissions in the last 5 years? |
|
Billabong has published its carbon footprint for its global operations (Scopes 1 & 2). However, numbers show an increase of a footprint by 61% for 2010-2011 (see 'Comparisons to prior year'). | Source |
| 3. Has the brand (company) set a target to reduce its absolute ‘own operations’ carbon emissions by at least 20% within the next 5 years? |
|
In 2010 Billabong has set a target to reduce carbon emissions by 15% by 2017 (see 'Carbon reduction target'). It is about 2% per year and much less than the target of 20% reduction in 5 years. | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) also have a policy to reduce/compensate carbon emissions generated from the product supply chain that is beyond own operations (Scope 3)? |
|
Although Billabong says that it "continues to build its understanding of its impact on the environment and is pursuing a range of initiatives designed to reduce its overall carbon footprint”, to get a ‘yes’ Billabong needs to be more specific (see 'Comparisons to prior year'). | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 5% of its volume? |
|
Although Billabong does use organically grown cotton and recycled polyester, they do not state the numbers used in terms of percentage of the total volume (see 'Sustainable Products'). | Source |
| 2. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 10% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 3. Does the brand (company) use environmentally 'preferred' raw materials for more than 25% of its volume? |
|
See remark for environmental policy question 1. | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have an environmental policy related to the ‘wet processes’ within the production cycle, like bleaching and dying of fabrics? |
|
Some information given about chemical and water use, but very minimal (see 'Sustainable Products'). | Source |
| 1. Does the brand (company) have a supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) which includes the following standards: No forced or slave labor, no child labor, no discrimination of any kind and a safe and hygienic workplace? |
|
Billabong follows the SA8000 standards (see 'Why adopt a standard'). For Code of Conduct (CoC) SA8000, see source links to questions 2&3 below. In this CoC, all these standards are mentioned (see page 5-7). | Source |
| 2. Does this CoC include at least two of the following workers rights: 1. to have a formally registered employment relationship 2. to have a maximum working week of 48 hours with voluntary and paid overtime of 12 hours maximum 3. to have a sufficient living wage? |
|
1. Not mentioned; 2. Maximum workweek of 48 hours, overtime is generally voluntary; 3. Yes, commitment to implement payment of living wages (see page 7). | Source |
| 3. Does this Code of Conduct include the right for workers to form and join trade unions and bargain collectively; and in those situations where these rights are restricted under law, the right to facilitate parallel means of independent and free association and bargaining? |
|
This right is mentioned, with reference to parallel means for the situation of law restrictions (see page 6/7). | Source |
| 4. Does the brand (company) have a published list of direct suppliers, that have collectively contributed to more than 90% of the purchase volume? |
|
No list found on Billabong website, although Billabong does mention some countries. | Source |
| 5. Is the brand (company) a member of a collective initiative that aims to improve labor conditions, or does the brand (company) purchase its supplies from accredited factories with improved labor conditions? |
|
Billabong refers to the certification scheme SA8000, but not clear what percentage of factories/ annual volume is certified (see ‘Why adopt a standard?’). | Source |
| 6. Do independent civil society organizations like NGO's and labor unions have a decisive voice in this collective initiative or in these certification schemes? |
|
Billabong refers to the certification scheme SA8000 that is acknowlegded for this question, but not clear what percentage of factories/ annual volume is certified (see ‘Why adopt a standard?’). | Source |
| 7. Does the brand (company) annually report on the results of its labor conditions policy? |
|
Good description of audit process, corrective actions, etc. is given. However, Billabong could be more clear on the number and location of factories covered by the performed audits. | Source |
| 8. Has the brand’s labor conditions policy resulted in a ‘compliance level’ of at least 30% of the purchase volume, or a ‘monitored level' of at least 80%? |
|
26 factories are SA8000 certified (out of more than 400, so only 6,5%). Further, Billabong reports that 339 factories out of 400 have been monitored. However, the audits are carried out by companies auditors (see 'Auditing of the supply chain'). | Source |